New DOJ Guidance Takes a Closer Look at Corporate Compliance Programs and Incentivizes Cooperation in False Claims Act Violations
July 11, 2019
DOJ Issues Guidance
The Department of Justice (“DOJ”) has issued guidance regarding its evaluation of corporate compliance programs in fraud investigations and its treatment of cooperation in False Claims Act (“FCA”) cases. Both documents provide important reminders to individuals and entities about the importance of effective compliance programs and responding proactively to potential noncompliance.
Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs
On April 30, 2019, the Fraud Section of the DOJ Criminal Division updated its guidance document entitled the “Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs” (“Evaluation”). According to the Introduction, this document is “meant to assist prosecutors in making informed decisions as to whether, and to what extent, the corporation’s compliance program was effective at the time of the offense.”
The Evaluation provides no rigid formula for analyzing corporate compliance programs but states that there are generally three “fundamental questions” prosecutors should consider:
- Is the corporation’s compliance program well designed?
- Is the program being applied earnestly and in good faith? In other words, is the program being implemented effectively?
- Does the corporation’s compliance program work in practice?
For each of these topics, the Evaluation identifies specific elements for prosecutors to consider when evaluating compliance programs. In analyzing whether a compliance program is well designed, prosecutors should consider the entity’s risk assessment, policies and procedures, training and communications, confidential reporting structure and investigation process, third party management, and mergers and acquisitions. The elements of an effectively implemented compliance program should include a commitment by senior and middle management, autonomy and resources, and incentives and disciplinary measures. Finally, the DOJ identifies metrics relevant to considering whether the compliance program works in practice. These metrics include continuous improvement, periodic testing, and review; investigation of misconduct; and analysis and remediation of any underlying misconduct.
Although this guidance is aimed at prosecutorial considerations after an offense has occurred, it also provides a roadmap for providers to consider when evaluating the effectiveness of their current compliance programs.
On May 7, 2019, the DOJ Civil Division issued formal guidance regarding how the DOJ will award cooperation credit to defendants in FCA proceedings. This guidance, codified in Justice Manual Section 4-4.112, specifies what types of cooperation will make a defendant eligible for cooperation credit. According to the guidance, the three main factors considered by the DOJ are disclosure, cooperation, and remedial action.
The DOJ notes that it has a “strong interest” in incentivizing individuals and entities to voluntarily disclose potential FCA violations when they are discovered. An individual or entity who makes a timely and voluntary self-disclosure of an FCA violation will be eligible to receive credit during the resolution of the FCA case.
The DOJ further provides a non-exhaustive list of ten activities which can also constitute cooperation in an FCA investigation. These activities include, among others, identifying the individuals substantially involved in or responsible for the misconduct, disclosing relevant facts and identifying opportunities for the government to obtain relevant evidence, and preserving, collecting, and disclosing relevant documents and information beyond existing legal requirements.
The DOJ will also consider whether an entity takes appropriate remedial actions in response to an FCA violation.
These DOJ documents demonstrate the importance of effective compliance programs and timely responses to any suspected or actual violations. Individuals and entities should regularly evaluate their compliance programs for their design and effectiveness.
The full text of the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs can be found here.
The full text of the DOJ’s cooperation credit guidance can be found here.
For More Information
Foulston Siefkin’s healthcare lawyers maintain a high level of expertise regarding federal and state regulations affecting the healthcare industry. The firm devotes significant resources to ensure our attorneys remain up-to-date on developments. At the same time, our healthcare practice group's relationship with Foulston Siefkin’s other practice groups, including the taxation, general business, labor and employment, and commercial litigation groups, enhances our ability to consider all of the legal ramifications of any situation or strategy. If you have questions regarding compliance programs or need assistance with drafting, updating, or implementing a compliance program and/or training on compliance, contact Brooke Bennett Aziere at 316.291.9768 or email@example.com. For more information on the firm, please visit our website at www.foulston.com.
Established in 1919, Foulston Siefkin is the largest law firm in Kansas. With offices in Wichita, Kansas City, and Topeka, Foulston Siefkin provides a full range of legal services to clients in the areas of administrative & regulatory; antitrust & trade regulation; appellate law; banking & financial services; business & corporate; construction; creditors’ rights & bankruptcy; e-commerce; education & public entity; elder law; emerging small business; employee benefits & ERISA; employment & labor; energy; environmental; ERISA litigation; estate planning & probate; family business enterprise; franchise & distribution; government investigations & white collar defense; governmental liability; government relations & public policy; healthcare; immigration; insurance regulatory; intellectual property; litigation & disputes; mediation/dispute resolution; mergers & acquisitions; Native American law; oil, gas & minerals; OSHA; privacy & data security; private equity & venture capital; product liability; professional malpractice; real estate; securities & corporate finance; senior housing & care; supply chain management; tax exempt organizations; taxation; trade secret & noncompete litigation; water rights; and wind & solar energy.
Health Law Resources
Sign up to receive these issue alerts straight to your inbox here. We also invite you to join us for the annual Health Law Institute in Wichita on September 27, 2019, or Kansas City on October 16, 2019, for the latest developments in state and federal health law and regulations impacting operations and practices.
This update has been prepared by Foulston Siefkin LLP for informational purposes only. It is not a legal opinion; it does not provide legal advice for any purpose; and it neither creates nor constitutes evidence of an attorney-client relationship.